A hurdle on grass

What stops Workplace adjustments working

A workplace needs assessment has been completed. Recommendations have been made. Everyone agreed the adjustments made sense. And yet, six months later, very little has changed.

This is one of the most common and frustrating patterns in neurodivergent workplace support. Understanding what stops workplace adjustments working is not just useful, it is essential if you want the investment of time and resource to translate into real, lasting change.

This post explores the barriers that repeatedly come up in practice, grouped by theme, with practical guidance on what HR leaders and managers can do about each one.

What stops workplace adjustments working: the relationship layer

The single most significant factor in whether adjustments succeed or fail is the relationship between the employee and their line manager.

When there is trust and psychological safety, adjustments can be explored collaboratively. When there is not, even well-designed recommendations sit untouched. An employee who does not feel safe raising concerns will not flag when something is not working. A manager who feels blamed or undermined by the process will implement adjustments grudgingly if at all.

Effective adjustment implementation requires:

  • Clarity about what is being asked of the manager and why
  • Genuine openness on both sides to try things, review, and adapt
  • A shared understanding that this is not a judgment on either party

If the working relationship is strained before the assessment begins, that context matters. A good assessor will work with that reality rather than around it.

What stops workplace adjustments working: unclear expectations

Many adjustments fail not because they are wrong, but because neither the manager nor the employee is clear on what success looks like.

Adjustments that are vague  “check in more regularly” or “be flexible about deadlines” leave too much room for misinterpretation. The manager thinks they are doing it. The employee feels nothing has changed. Neither is wrong. The adjustment simply was not specific enough to be actionable.

This is compounded when employees are unsure what good looks like in their role more broadly. If feedback is infrequent, unclear, or inconsistently delivered, even someone who is performing well can feel perpetually uncertain. For neurodivergent employees, that uncertainty carries a disproportionate cognitive and emotional cost.

Clear expectations, delivered consistently and kindly, are one of the most powerful adjustments a manager can make — and they cost nothing.

What stops workplace adjustments working: time, focus, and task management

A significant proportion of workplace adjustment recommendations focus on how work is structured and sequenced. These are often the adjustments that get deprioritised because they require the most ongoing attention.

Common barriers in this area include:

  • Time blindness, making it genuinely difficult to estimate how long tasks will take or to sense urgency without external cues
  • Difficulty switching between tasks, particularly when interrupted
  • Poor planning systems that do not match how the individual actually processes work
  • Focus on challenges that mean open-plan or noisy environments create a consistent drag on performance

These are not motivational problems. They are neurological differences that require practical, specific adjustments: protected focus time, visual task management tools, clear prioritisation support, or a quieter working environment. Where those adjustments are put in place and reviewed regularly, performance typically improves. Where they are agreed once and then forgotten, nothing changes.

What stops workplace adjustments working: the emotional and psychological layer

This is the layer that is least often discussed and most often the root cause of stalled progress.

Shame and fear are quietly present in many neurodivergent employees’ experience of work. Fear of being judged as insufficient. Shame about patterns that have caused difficulty for years. Anxiety about being misunderstood, or about asking for too much. These feelings do not disappear once adjustments are in place. They often shape whether someone is willing to use them.

Masking the effort to appear neurotypical in order to fit in is exhausting and corrosive. When an employee is spending significant energy managing how they appear, there is very little left for the actual work. Adjustments that reduce the need to mask are among the most impactful, but they require managers to actively create an environment where difference is genuinely accepted, not just tolerated.

Perfectionism and overworking are also common, particularly in high performers who have learned to compensate for their difficulties by working harder than anyone else. When energy drops, as it inevitably does, the gap between expectation and output can feel catastrophic. Adjustments that explicitly allow doing less, pacing more carefully, or stopping at a reasonable time are harder to implement than they sound.

What good implementation looks like

Adjustments work best when they are treated as a starting point rather than a fixed solution. What helps at the beginning may need to evolve. Regular check-ins between the employee and their manager, focused specifically on how the adjustments are working, create the conditions for refinement.

The managers who implement adjustments most effectively tend to approach the process with genuine curiosity. They want to understand what is actually happening, not just what the report recommends. They treat the relationship as collaborative and the adjustments as shared experiments.

That mindset cannot be mandated, but it can be developed. Our talks and workshops are specifically designed to build this kind of practical confidence in managers, giving them the knowledge and tools to support neurodivergent employees effectively in the day-to-day.

When to bring in structured support

If adjustments consistently fail to work despite good intentions on both sides, it is worth asking whether the original assessment fully captured what is going on. The ACAS guide on reasonable adjustments is a useful reference point for what the process should involve and what obligations sit with the employer.

Our Workplace Needs Assessment packages are designed to go beyond a standard list of recommendations, providing context, manager involvement, and follow-through support that increase the likelihood of successful implementation. And where ongoing one-to-one support would help an employee embed new strategies, our coaching offer works alongside the assessment process rather than in parallel.

Ready to take the next step?

If you are working through what stops workplace adjustments from working in your organisation, we can help you identify the specific barriers and build a practical plan to address them.

Get in touch to start a conversation, or sign up to our newsletter for monthly insights on supporting neurodivergent employees at work.

Colleague Dynamics at Work Two speech bubbles on a blue background

Colleague dynamics at work: the hidden impact on neurodiversity and what managers can do

Work is not just about tasks. It is a living ecosystem of conversations, expectations, and unspoken rules.

For many people, colleague relationships shape whether they thrive or simply endure the working day. For neurodivergent employees, this impact can be even more pronounced. Subtle tensions, unclear communication, or shifting social dynamics can be difficult to interpret. What might feel like a minor issue to one person can create disproportionate stress, confusion, or distress for another.

This is why colleague dynamics at work are not a soft issue. They are central to performance, wellbeing, and retention and every manager and HR leader needs to understand them.

The hidden layer: what managers often miss

Many workplace challenges are not about capability. They are about context.

A team member might be struggling to focus, appear withdrawn, avoid collaboration, or seem overly sensitive to feedback. But beneath the surface, there may be confusing or inconsistent communication, unspoken tensions within the team, a sense of exclusion from informal networks, or persistent anxiety about being misunderstood.

For someone who finds social interpretation difficult, this can feel like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces. Over time, that uncertainty can lead to increased masking, burnout, reduced confidence, and disengagement.

As the CIPD’s research on neurodivergent employees highlights, the workplace environment and the quality of working relationships are among the most significant factors in whether neurodivergent employees can perform at their best.

Fairness, not sameness: a better approach for managers

Supporting neurodiversity at work is not about treating everyone the same. It is about treating people fairly, with awareness of different needs.

This often involves being curious rather than making assumptions, noticing patterns in team dynamics, creating space for open and non-judgemental conversations, and being willing to experiment with adjustments.

Small changes can have a significant impact. Clarifying expectations and communication styles, addressing tension early rather than letting it build, making implicit team norms more explicit, and checking in regularly rather than only when something goes wrong, these approaches cost little but can change everything.

When dynamics become distressing

In some cases, workplace colleague dynamics can cross into unkindness, exclusion, or persistent misunderstanding.

This might look like being consistently left out of conversations or decisions, communication that feels abrupt or unclear, misinterpretation of tone or intent on both sides, or escalating tension that no one addresses directly. For neurodivergent individuals, these situations can feel intense, personal, and very difficult to resolve without support.

Managers play a crucial role here. Noticing what is happening and stepping in early can prevent significant and unnecessary distress. This does not mean taking sides. It means creating clarity, facilitating understanding, and supporting healthier ways of working together.

The role of Workplace Needs Assessments

A powerful starting point when colleague dynamics are affecting a team member’s performance or well-being is a Workplace Needs Assessment.

These assessments go beyond tasks and look at the full working environment, including colleague dynamics and relationships. They help explore how someone experiences their team, where communication breakdowns may be happening, what is visible to others and what remains hidden, and what practical adjustments could reduce stress and improve performance.

Importantly, they create a structured, supportive space for conversations that might otherwise never happen.

Strengthening teams, not just individuals

While individual support matters, the real opportunity lies in supporting the whole team.

This can include building the building manager’s confidence in handling neurodiversity, improving team understanding and communication, creating shared language around strengths and challenges, and designing ways of working that reduce friction. When teams understand each other better, collaboration improves, misunderstandings reduce, and people spend less energy navigating tension and more on meaningful work.

If you would like to build this kind of understanding across your organisation, our talks and workshops are designed specifically for managers and HR teams who want practical tools for navigating exactly these dynamics. One-to-one coaching is also available for managers who want to build confidence in supporting neurodivergent team members directly.

What to look out for

If you are a manager or HR professional, these questions can be a useful starting point:

  • Does this person feel seen and understood, or are they masking?
  • Are there unspoken tensions affecting their behaviour?
  • Do they feel included in informal networks or isolated?
  • Are they carrying stress that is not immediately visible?
  • Is the team environment helping them succeed, or making things harder?

Sometimes the biggest barriers are not obvious. They sit quietly in day-to-day interactions, and they rarely resolve themselves without someone deciding to look more closely.

Creating workplaces where people can thrive

Recognising the human side of work is not about fixing people. It is about creating conditions where people do not have to carry everything alone.

When managers notice, listen, and act thoughtfully, stress reduces, trust builds, and performance improves. Most importantly, people can show up as themselves without unnecessary strain.

Ready to take the next step?

If colleague dynamics at work are affecting someone in your team, or if you would like to build wider understanding across your organisation, we can help.

Our talks and workshops give managers and teams the practical tools and shared language to work more effectively together. A Workplace Needs Assessment can provide a structured starting point when individual support is needed. And our coaching offer supports both managers and employees in building the confidence and strategies to navigate these challenges well.

You are welcome to get in touch to discuss a specific situation, or sign up for our newsletter for monthly insights on supporting neurodivergent employees at work.

Neurodiversity and time - A clock with multiple hands in different colours showing different times. Neurodiversity and time

Neurodiversity and time: what HR leaders and managers need to know

Time is one of the few things we all share, yet how we experience it can vary significantly. When it comes to neurodiversity and time, this variation can be even more pronounced, showing up in everything from difficulty sensing the passage of time to having specific windows of intense productivity that do not align with the standard working day.

As organisations work to become more inclusive and unlock the full potential of their teams, understanding how time shows up differently for different people is not a nice-to-have. It is an essential part of good management.

Neurodiversity and time blindness: a hidden challenge

One of the most common time-related challenges for neurodivergent people, particularly those with ADHD or autism, is time blindness. This is a neurological trait that makes it difficult to sense the passage of time or estimate how long tasks will take.

For managers, this can look like:

  • Missed deadlines and consistent difficulty with time estimation
  • Overcommitting or underestimating recovery time between meetings
  • Late arrivals or missed appointments that appear careless but are not
  • Increased anxiety and shame when the behaviour is misread as a lack of effort

Importantly, this is not a question of effort or willpower. Researcher Dr Russell Barkley has described ADHD-related challenges as deficits not in knowledge but in performance, driven by differences in executive functioning. When managers understand this, they respond differently.

Everyone has a rhythm: are you paying attention?

Beyond time blindness, there is another important layer to the neurodiversity and time conversation: natural energy rhythms.

While some people are productive at 8am, others hit their stride mid-afternoon or in quieter, lower-stimulation periods. These patterns are influenced by chronotype, sleep, nutrition, environment, and sensory input  and for neurodivergent individuals, they can be particularly pronounced.

A team member might be sharply focused and idea-rich in the morning, but struggle to process verbal instructions after lunch. Or they may be slower to start but become deeply productive later in the day, particularly when the office has quietened down.

Neither pattern is wrong. Both are real, and both have implications for how work should be designed and scheduled.

Why this matters for HR and leadership

Understanding and working with these personal time rhythms is a leadership responsibility, not just a personal preference.

When organisations design work around peak energy periods, the results are measurable: increased productivity, improved wellbeing and morale, stronger employee retention, and better return on investment from external support such as Access to Work provisions.

But here is the key: these adjustments must be made with people, not to them. Imposing a new schedule without understanding someone’s actual patterns is unlikely to help and may cause harm.

Neurodiversity and time: why partnership is everything

Effective support is not about top-down change. It is about partnership, creating space where employees and managers can explore together what works, what does not, and what could help.

This is where a coaching approach becomes genuinely valuable. Rather than jumping straight to solutions, coaching invites curiosity and collaboration. It makes space for questions like:

  • When do you feel most focused during the day?
  • What tends to drain your energy?
  • How do you know when you are slipping into overwhelm?
  • What adjustments have helped you before, even small ones?
  • What would a good working day look like for you?

This kind of conversation, when handled well, shifts the dynamic from performance management to genuine partnership. It also tends to surface practical, low-cost, high-impact adjustments.

As coach and author Claire Pedrick puts it: “Great coaching is not about fixing people; it is about enabling them to think.” In a workplace context, that might mean co-designing a schedule, experimenting with different meeting times, or negotiating deadlines that better match natural energy peaks, all with shared ownership and respect.

Practical approaches that make a difference

Supporting neurodivergent team members with time-related challenges can involve a range of practical tools and adjustments.

Some approaches that work well include:

  • Visual timers or clocks to reinforce time awareness
  • Time-blocking techniques tailored to energy levels, not arbitrary 9-to-5 slots
  • External reminders and accountability tools, such as apps or shared calendars
  • Regular check-ins to review workload and energy across the week
  • Encouraging the use of Access to Work support for coaching or assistive technology

What matters most is that the process is collaborative. What works for one person will not work for everyone, and building in space to test, adjust, and review is what makes any of these strategies sustainable.

If you are unsure where to start, a Workplace Needs Assessment provides a structured, evidence-based way to identify what adjustments would make the most difference for a specific individual.

Building a culture of time awareness

Supporting neurodivergent employees with time and energy is not just about individual adjustments. It reflects a broader aspect of workplace culture.

Moving away from one-size-fits-all assumptions about the ideal working day, and towards asking when people work best and how the organisation can support that, creates a ripple effect. Trust improves. Output improves. People stay longer.

That shift benefits not only neurodivergent employees. It tends to benefit everyone.

Ready to take the next step?

If you would like to build this kind of understanding across your management team, our talks and workshops are designed to give managers the practical knowledge and confidence to have exactly these conversations.

For individual employees who would benefit from one-to-one support with time, energy, and executive function, our coaching offer is a natural next step.

You are also welcome to get in touch to discuss a specific situation or sign up for our newsletter for monthly insights on supporting neurodivergent employees at work.

 

A level gauge showing high energy levels with a smiley in the middle

Supporting energy regulation at work: A manager’s guide.

Supporting energy regulation at work can feel daunting, especially for managers who are well intentioned but anxious about getting it wrong. When someone’s energy fluctuates, it is often misread as a motivation issue, disengagement, or poor performance.

In reality, energy regulation is about capacity, not effort.

Many people, including those with ADHD or other neurodivergent traits, experience uneven energy across the day, week, or month. Others may be impacted by stress, workload design, health, or broader life demands. None of this is visible at a glance.

This guide is not about diagnosing, fixing, or managing someone’s personal life. It is about helping managers create the right conditions, ask better questions, and work in partnership to support sustainable performance.

Supporting energy regulation at work: why it is not a performance problem

One of the most important mindset shifts for managers is this: fluctuating energy is not a lack of commitment or capability.

In fact, some of the people who struggle most with energy regulation appear to be high performers. They deliver excellent work, meet deadlines, and say yes to everything. The cost is often hidden.

Over time, this can look like:

  • Working long hours to compensate for low-energy periods
  • Hyperfocus that masks exhaustion
  • Sudden drops in capacity after periods of intense output
  • Burnout that feels unexpected because performance looked strong

Supporting energy regulation at work means learning to look beyond outputs alone and to notice how work is sustained.

A shared responsibility, with clear boundaries

This is not about managers taking responsibility for sleep, exercise, hormones, or self-care. That is neither appropriate nor effective.

Instead, energy regulation sits across three layers.

What sits with the individual: self-awareness of energy patterns, communicating what helps or hinders, and experimenting with strategies that support them.

What sits with the manager: creating psychological safety, structuring work thoughtfully, reducing unnecessary energy drains, and opening up supportive conversations.

What sits with the organisation: meeting culture, expectations around availability, workflow design and pace, and how time and attention are valued.

When these layers work together, energy stops being a personal struggle and becomes a shared design question.

Matching tasks to energy: a core principle of supporting energy regulation at work

Different types of work require different kinds of energy. This is true for everyone, but especially important when supporting energy regulation at work.

For example, high-energy or high-focus periods may suit deep thinking, problem-solving, or creative work. Lower-energy periods may be better for admin, routine tasks, or preparation. Social or collaborative energy may peak at different times than analytical energy.

When this alignment is off, people become distracted, inefficient, and frustrated. They may spend prime energy time in meetings that add little value, then struggle to complete focused work later.

A simple but powerful manager question is: “What kinds of work feel easiest or hardest at different times of the day?” This is not about rigid schedules. It is about permission to experiment.

Designing the working day to support energy regulation at work

Energy is shaped by how the day fits together, not just individual tasks.

Managers can support energy regulation at work by paying attention to:

  • How the day is started, since rushed starts drain energy quickly
  • Whether focus time is protected or constantly interrupted
  • How meetings are scheduled and whether they are truly needed
  • Whether there is space to close the day down, rather than carrying work mentally into the evening

Poor day design leads to constant context switching, wasted effort, and the feeling of being busy without making progress. This is not an individual failing. It is a system issue.

Body doubling as a legitimate support tool

One practical and often misunderstood strategy for energy regulation is body doubling.

Body doubling means working alongside someone else, either in person or virtually, without necessarily collaborating on the same task. The presence of another person can help regulate attention, energy, and momentum.

Examples include quiet co-working sessions, camera-on focus time, sitting together to start a task and then working independently, or shared working hours rather than check-in meetings.

For many people, especially those with ADHD traits, body doubling reduces the energy cost of task initiation and helps sustain focus. It is not micromanagement. It is a way of sharing regulation, not enforcing control.

Early signs something is not working

Managers often spot problems too late because they are looking for performance drops rather than energy strain.

Early signs to notice include:

  • Someone always “on” with no visible recovery time
  • Reluctance to take breaks or time off
  • Irritability, withdrawal, or increased perfectionism
  • Difficulty switching off at the end of the day
  • A growing mismatch between effort and impact

Naming these observations gently can open up preventative conversations long before burnout occurs.

The cultural elephant in the room

It is impossible to talk about supporting energy regulation at work without addressing culture.

Many workplaces unintentionally drain energy through pointless or excessive meetings, treating everything as urgent, expecting constant responsiveness, and valuing visibility over value.

Challenging this does not mean lowering standards. It means using people’s time and energy well.

The UK Health and Safety Executive highlights workload, control, and support as key factors in work-related stress. Poor energy design is not just inefficient: it is a wellbeing risk.

A practical toolkit for supporting energy regulation at work

This is not about giving managers a script or checklist. It is about creating the right kinds of conversations.

Useful questions include:

  • “Where does your energy tend to go during the day?”
  • “What feels harder than it should at the moment?”
  • “What would be worth experimenting with for a few weeks?”
  • “What drains energy here that we could change together?”

The goal is not answers. The goal is shared understanding.

When more structured support helps

Sometimes, conversations and small experiments are not enough. Patterns keep repeating, or the energy cost of work remains too high.

This is where a Workplace Needs Assessment can be a powerful next step. It provides a structured, evidence-based way to understand what is really going on and what adjustments could make work more sustainable.

Managers do not need to have all the answers. They just need to know when to bring in the right support.

Ready to take the next step?

If you are working to build a more sustainable, inclusive environment for neurodivergent employees, our talks and workshops are designed to help managers and teams have exactly these kinds of conversations with confidence.

For individual employees who would benefit from one-to-one support, our coaching offer works well alongside the practical workplace changes explored in this post.

You are also welcome to get in touch to talk through a specific situation.

And if you would like practical insights on supporting neurodivergent employees delivered monthly, sign up to our newsletter.

Supporting energy regulation at work is not about perfection. When managers stop misreading energy dips as motivation problems, create permission to experiment, and challenge systems that drain people unnecessarily, something changes. People do not just cope: they thrive.